Toyota Tax Break? Better Hurry…

by Sean

If you’re thinking of getting that [tag]Toyota[/tag] [tag]Prius[/tag] or [tag]Highlander[/tag] Hybrid and want to take full advantage of the hybrid [tag]tax credit[/tag], better hurry. Shortly after a manufacturer sells 60,000 hybrid vehicles, the credit begins to phase out. And with Toyota selling almost 150,000 hybrids last year, it won’t take long to hit that mark.

Personally, the phaseout seems a little ridiculous to me. Oh, sure, $204 million (60,000 vehicles x a max credit of $3,400) per manufacturer isn’t exactly chump change. But if they’re willing to consider $328 million for a ‘Bridge to Nowhere’, this low a cap on something that can only intensify research into something as important as [tag]alternative energy[/tag] sources just seems a little short-sighted to me.

Yes, before you say it, I know that hybrids aren’t necessarily a money savings purchase. And I won’t be purchasing a [tag]hybrid[/tag] anytime soon for that very reason. But, if my finances were in better condition – i.e. sans a $17,000 credit card balance – and was in the market for a new car, I’d certainly consider taking the financial hit in order to help finance the science.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com likwidshoe

    Science can fund itself. No need to make the taxpayer fund it while pointing out other egregious examples of pork to make your case.

    The simple reality is that hybrid technology isn’t to the point where mass production makes sense. When and if that point ever comes (and it probably will one day), the free market takes over for the profit incentive.

  • http://www.irregularpayments.com Sean

    I’d agree that there is a definite role in the free market in making a lot of scienctific knowledge affordable and practical. However, I’m also generally of the opinion that a lot of theoretical R&D would never get done without the aid of government funding (mainly because of the short-sightedness of a lot of corporate America). For instance, this internet thingy we’re communicating over would almost certainly not be nearly as ubiquitous, usable, or, assuredly, as cheap as it is today if we had to wait for the private sector to develop and implement it.

    Considering the supposed importance on ending our addiction to oil (of which domestic production will never meet demand without some radical changes to energy efficiency), a paltry $200million subsidy (rather than direct grants to researchers as I would advocate) is a joke. But at least it’s a nod in the right direction.

    (I’m not sure there’s really any point in debating the matter with you, as I can tell from the site you’re using as your tag that we’re likely coming from wildly divergent viewpoints, but eh, it’s a slow Tuesday, so I’ll at least respond.)

  • Fimo

    Thats good to hear.maybe the price will drop sooner rather than later.nevertheless.good start.

Previous post:

Next post: